Permalink
Rubi writes, “The battle rages on, but apparently i’m losing because everyone in my town are close minded sexists.” I know the original image is a little small, so allow me to transcribe this…debate? Jackass festival? I don’t know, but here’s the transcript (with my commentary in bold/parentheses):
- Morgan: If your shorts are shorter than your underwear you need new shorts, slut. (Starting off strong.)
- Rubi: *Posts link to this video*
- Morgan Hatten: You like to listen to 13year olds?] Thats cool.
- Rubi: That 13 year old is more educated than you apparently, because knowledge isn’t measured by age. And by calling a promiscuous girl a slut you are dehumanizing her, and degrading her.
- Morgan: If her vagina is hanging out of her shorts, then I have the right. (Sure, from a legal standpoint. Doesn’t make you less of an asshole or a misogynist though.) I’m currently using the 2nd amendment to my advantage. (O.o WHAT. OMFG WHAT JUST HAPPENED WHAT THE WHAT) I didn’tstate a name so it didnt harm anyone. Oh and by REAL definition I wasnt “slut shamming” in the first place. (That’s true, you were slut shaming. “Slut shamming” is actually more about provocative pillowcases than actually passing judgment on others.) Feel more than free to write me when I do Kay bye.
- Danielle: it’s not dehumanizing them, if they dont wanna be called sluts, they wouldnt dress like that. (I know when I put on a sexy dress, I think to myself, “Gee, I hope Danielle Emmons and Morgan Hatten call me a slut today!”. They WANT to be called sluts!)
- Michael Salas: Umm srry but u act like u knew about that slut shaming stuff so tbh if ur 13 it not as smart as someone who has graduate. (“it not as smart as someone who has graduated”. Disproved in one sentence of your own post, buddy.) So it kinda Is based on age why re you defending sluts anyway

